Heart Happy (cathy_edgett) wrote,
Heart Happy
cathy_edgett

This is unbelievable!

We are now all used to the obvious product placement in movies, and sometimes TV programs, the placement that began with ET and Reese's pieces.  It might have been M & M's, but they turned it down, missing the first opportunity to pay for advertising in movies.  Now, there is this.  I am shocked, and I wonder why I am shocked, and I am. 

Editorial in the NY Times today!

The Art of the Deal

Published: June 17, 2006

When a publisher starts talking about a book as "an experience that transcends the book itself," you know that what matters isn't going to be the writing. What matters is the synergy, as they used to call it in the good old AOL Time Warner days.

The book in question is "Cathy's Book," a novel for adolescent girls featuring a heroine who gives tips on makeup while the story unfolds. As it happens, the makeup she uses is by Cover Girl, which, in return for product placement, has agreed to feature the novel prominently on a Web site it runs for girls of the very age group likely to buy "Cathy's Book." If nothing else, this deal is a reminder that writers will nearly always take publicity if they can't get cash.

But this deal is also a reminder that it's almost ridiculous to speak of a "book" or a "record" or even a "movie" anymore. What we should be talking about is different states of the same cultural matrix — the way ice, water, and steam are different states of H2O. Sure, there are writers out there intent on writing a "book," just as there are musicians intent on making a "record." But for projects of a certain ilk — a much better word than genre, somehow — the real artistry lies in the elusive way so many cultural threads are tied into a single knot. It's easy enough to bemoan a project like "Cathy's Book," and yet it captures the weird coalescence of the shape-shifting culture adolescent girls live in, where the borders between advertising and literature, podcast and sitcom, novel and lipstick go unpatrolled.

When you think about it, literature must seem to young readers like a strangely antiseptic universe, wholly devoid of the art form they know best: advertising. It's a fair bet that an ordinary young American has absorbed far more "content" — to use a synergistic word — derived from advertising than from almost any other source. Marketing products in literature intended for young readers is still a terrible idea, of course. If nothing else, books should remind them that there once was a time when life was not entirely about shopping.

Subscribe

  • Return -

    I haven't been here in awhile and I return today to learn there is a "new post editor". I start to try it and then go back to the old. I am…

  • It's Morning!

    I've been here at Live Journal since October, 2005. I started it to keep in touch with family and friends as I went through cancer treatment.…

  • The sun is shining!

    Where I live the sun is shining and the buds have popped out so the plum trees are waving white. We've had months of rain, record breaking rain and…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments